Case File
VARGINHA-004
Doctor claims the being communicated with him in dreams for 11 years
He examined the subject for nineteen minutes in 1996. He says it spoke to him every night for eleven years after.
- Type
- TRANSCRIPT
- Date of Record
- 2007-06-19
- Source
- Self-recorded testimony, deposited with private notary
Abstract
Sealed testimony from a regional surgeon, since deceased, describing recurring dream-state communication with a subject he examined briefly in 1996. Witness reports the contact escalated from impressions to structured language over a decade. Notary released the recording in accordance with the witness's standing instructions.
Artifact Inventory
- Witness
- Regional surgeon (deceased 2009)
- Recording date
- 2007-06-19
- Runtime
- 1 hour 47 minutes
- Held by
- Notary office, southern Minas Gerais
The deposit
The witness recorded the testimony alone, in a single sitting, in his home study in June 2007. He delivered the cassette personally to a notary the following week along with written instructions that it was not to be released until two years after his death. He died in 2009. The instructions were honored.
The notary's release statement notes that the witness appeared lucid, gave clear oral confirmation of the contents on the day of deposit, and declined an offer to revise or shorten the recording before sealing it.
What the recording contains
The witness describes a brief 1996 examination, ordered by a senior officer he did not recognize, of a subject he was permitted to see only above the waist. He notes pulse, respiration rate, and surface temperature, all of which he found impossible to reconcile with any human or known mammalian physiology.
He then describes the dreams. They began the same week and continued every night without exception until the year 2007. He says the early dreams were impressions only — pressure, attention, a sense of being read. He says the later dreams were structured: questions, answers, instructions he was repeatedly asked to remember.
He recites approximately forty minutes of material that he says was given to him in dream. He is careful to note, twice, that he does not understand most of what he is reciting, only that he was told to repeat it accurately.
What the recording does not contain
The witness does not name the patient, the facility, the senior officer, or any other person present at the examination. He gives no location more specific than "the southern highlands." He does not speculate on the origin of the subject or the meaning of the dream material. He ends the recording with the phrase, "I have done what was asked."